Titlebook: Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems; 4th International Wo Iyad Rahwan,Simon Parsons,Chris Reed Conference proceedings 2008 Springer-Verlag

fungus

書目名稱Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems被引頻次




書目名稱Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems年度引用




書目名稱Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems讀者反饋




書目名稱Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

Misnomer

毛細(xì)血管

Co-argumentation Artifact for Agent Societiesnge information..Argumentation is a dialogic process, and could occur through direct interaction, or through supports of some sorts—like blackboards, or electronic fora. The same holds for intelligent agents in a multi-agent system (MAS); here, however, it is not clear what could act as a support fo

fiscal

On the Relevance of Utterances in Formal Inter-agent Dialoguesd studied different properties of dialogues. This work has established the space in which agents are permitted to interact through dialogues. Recently, there has been increasing interest in the mechanisms agents might use to choose how to act — the rhetorical maneuvering that they use to navigate th

tympanometry

A Persuasion Dialog for Gaining Access to Informationial for agents engaged in autonomous, goal-directed behavior, but access to such information is usually controlled by other autonomous agents having their own goals. Because these various goals may be in conflict with one another, rational interactions between the two agents may take the form of a d

颶風(fēng)

Towards Characterising Argumentation Based Dialogue in the Argument Interchange Formatn and communication of argumentation knowledge amongst agents. The AIF is described as an abstract model, or “ontology”, characterising the core concepts and their relationships. Concrete reifications or syntaxes instantiating these concepts have also been described. Thus far the focus has been on r

謊言

incontinence

The Hedgehog and the Foxs a concrete data structure for holding statements representing knowledge, goals, and decisions. Different priorities are attached to these items, corresponding to the probability of the knowledge, the preferences between goals, and the expected utilities of decisions. These concrete data structures

enormous

不妥協(xié)