Titlebook: Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems; 6th International Wo Peter McBurney,Iyad Rahwan,Nicolas Maudet Conference proceedings 2010 Springer-V

BLAZE

0302-9743 Overview: 978-3-642-12804-2978-3-642-12805-9Series ISSN 0302-9743 Series E-ISSN 1611-3349

meretricious

博愛家

978-3-642-12804-2Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

興奮過(guò)度

Adjourn

人類學(xué)家

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28908-8evious work of computing argumentation semantics in answer set programming (ASP). Thus this study eventually reveals the greatest advantage of applying ASP to the crucial decision problems in the research field of argumentation.

MENT

V. P. Andreev,T. I. Kovaleva,I. N. Usovaer describes how these issues were resolved and implemented in PISA, and illustrates the operation of PISA using an example based on a dataset relating to nursery provision. Finally some experiments comparing PISA with other classifiers are reported.

很像弓]

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-67895-4he agents have to negotiate. In this paper, we propose an approach that combines modularization with argumentation to generate focused domains of discourse to facilitate communication. We empirically demonstrate that we can not only reduce the number of alignments required to reach consensus by an a

昏暗

pacific

Strategic Argumentation in Rigorous Persuasion Dialoguer inconsistency in its knowledge base, but also the incompleteness of its knowledge; and (ii) that it thus provides wider scope for strategic sophistication in multi-agent dialogue. We make two linked observations relating to strategy in RPD. dialogues — first, that there are minimal sets of beliefs