找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence; Guillermo Simari,Iyad Rahwan Book 2009 Springer-Verlag US 2009 Bayesian network.agents.argument

[復制鏈接]
查看: 50329|回復: 56
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 20:05:33 | 只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
期刊全稱Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence
影響因子2023Guillermo Simari,Iyad Rahwan
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/162/161533/161533.mp4
發(fā)行地址A confluence of deep exposition and comprehensive exploration by leading researchers of the underlying themes in the various areas of Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence.A progressive development
圖書封面Titlebook: Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence;  Guillermo Simari,Iyad Rahwan Book 2009 Springer-Verlag US 2009 Bayesian network.agents.argument
影響因子Argumentation is all around us. Letters to the Editor often make points of cons- tency, and “Why” is one of the most frequent questions in language, asking for r- sons behind behaviour. And argumentation is more than ‘reasoning’ in the recesses of single minds, since it crucially involves interaction. It cements the coordinated social behaviour that has allowed us, in small bands of not particularly physically impressive primates, to dominate the planet, from the mammoth hunt all the way up to organized science. This volume puts argumentation on the map in the eld of Arti cial Intelligence. This theme has been coming for a while, and some famous pioneers are chapter authors, but we can now see a broader systematic area emerging in the sum of topics and results. As a logician, I nd this intriguing, since I see AI as ‘logic continued by other means’, reminding us of broader views of what my discipline is about. Logic arose originally out of re ection on many-agent practices of disputation, in Greek Ant- uity, but also in India and China. And logicians like me would like to return to this broader agenda of rational agency and intelligent interaction. Of course, Aristotle also gave us
Pindex Book 2009
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence網(wǎng)絡公開度




書目名稱Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence網(wǎng)絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence被引頻次




書目名稱Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence年度引用




書目名稱Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence讀者反饋




書目名稱Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence讀者反饋學科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 21:29:41 | 只看該作者
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 00:39:19 | 只看該作者
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 06:04:18 | 只看該作者
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 11:35:31 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 13:54:10 | 只看該作者
Argumentation for Decision Makingt the preferences of the decision maker. This agent is assumed to behave in a . way [29] amgoud-woold, at least in the sense that his decisions should be as much as possible consistent with his preferences.
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 18:12:38 | 只看該作者
ntation in Artificial Intelligence.A progressive developmentArgumentation is all around us. Letters to the Editor often make points of cons- tency, and “Why” is one of the most frequent questions in language, asking for r- sons behind behaviour. And argumentation is more than ‘reasoning’ in the rece
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 22:05:23 | 只看該作者
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 02:11:59 | 只看該作者
Experimental Methods of Shock Wave Researcherred extensions establishes that its claim must be accepted as true, and membership of at least one preferred extension shows that the claim is at least tenable. In consequence, that admissible sets of arguments are conflict free is an important requirement under all the various semantics.
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 06:15:19 | 只看該作者
Rengarajan Sriram,Gopalan Jagadeeshack another argument, but it can also support another one. This suggests a notion of bipolarity, .. the existence of two independent kinds of information which have a diametrically opposed nature and which represent repellent forces.
 關于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經驗總結 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2026-1-24 17:35
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
永康市| 盐边县| 同江市| 蓝田县| 玛沁县| 岱山县| 弥渡县| 衡南县| 通海县| 沙坪坝区| 沿河| 马尔康县| 搜索| 建平县| 北票市| 乌什县| 南华县| 乐业县| 枣强县| 遂宁市| 常熟市| 贡山| 深圳市| 昔阳县| 宣威市| 兰西县| 康乐县| 扶绥县| 三河市| 景洪市| 美姑县| 大连市| 湖南省| 永登县| 溧水县| 错那县| 茶陵县| 峨眉山市| 凤庆县| 叙永县| 日照市|