Titlebook: Argumentation Machines; New Frontiers in Arg Chris Reed,Timothy J. Norman Book 2004 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2004 artifici

malfeasance

書目名稱Argumentation Machines影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Argumentation Machines影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Argumentation Machines網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Argumentation Machines網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Argumentation Machines被引頻次




書目名稱Argumentation Machines被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Argumentation Machines年度引用




書目名稱Argumentation Machines年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Argumentation Machines讀者反饋




書目名稱Argumentation Machines讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

我沒有強(qiáng)迫

Argument and Multi-Agent Systems,stems in which participants need to interact. Multiple interacting agents that engage in persuasive dialogue, negotiation and the construction of joint plans of action have the potential to provide argumentation theory with a means to implement and evaluate their theories. In this chapter we address

放縱

Wordlist

Computational Models, Argumentation Theories and Legal Practice,ion of legal argument. Taking the perspective of a lawyer we develop a conceptual model intended to accommodate all stages involved in legal argument. We then relate Argumentation Theory and work in AI and Law to this conceptual model. We conclude by considering the scope for the two disciplines lea

搖曳的微光

The Persuasion Machine,in order to persuade her of some point of view. The approach is to start with a focus upon breadth, and to bring structure to an ill-structured problem. From there, for each component and each subproblem, the linguistic, computational, rhetorical and argumentation-theoretic theory drivers are integr

foppish

細(xì)頸瓶

Norbert Fuhr,Paulo Quaresma,Nicola Ferrof the interdisciplinary field. By showing where such collaboration has been successful, it becomes easier to see the points at which renewed interaction between the fields might yield substantial gains. These points of potential growth are then briefly discussed to motivate and position the work des

TRUST

abduction

貴族

K. Sel?uk Candan,Bogdan Ionescu,Nicola Ferroion of legal argument. Taking the perspective of a lawyer we develop a conceptual model intended to accommodate all stages involved in legal argument. We then relate Argumentation Theory and work in AI and Law to this conceptual model. We conclude by considering the scope for the two disciplines lea