Titlebook: Argument Types and Fallacies in Legal Argumentation; Thomas Bustamante,Christian Dahlman Book 2015 Springer International Publishing Switz

ANTE

Argumentation from Reasonableness in the Justification of Judicial Decisionsvelop an argumentation model for the rational reconstruction that enables the analyst to make explicit the different considerations underlying a decision that is based on reasonableness so that they can be submitted to rational critique. To do justice to the context-dependency of the concept of reas

有抱負(fù)者

1572-4395 be able to distinguish the sound instances of a certain argument type from its unsound instances. This book promotes the development of theoretical tools for this task. .978-3-319-35487-3978-3-319-16148-8Series ISSN 1572-4395 Series E-ISSN 2215-0315

FECT

notice

Ger van den Engh,Jan Visser,Barbara Traskvelop an argumentation model for the rational reconstruction that enables the analyst to make explicit the different considerations underlying a decision that is based on reasonableness so that they can be submitted to rational critique. To do justice to the context-dependency of the concept of reas

THROB

罵人有污點(diǎn)

SIT

An Analysis of Some Juristic Techniques for Handling Systematic Defects in the Lawthe conceptual dichotomy first/second interpretation, the systematizing tools employed by jurists in order to create, avoid, or ascertain systematic defects of the law, such as normative gaps and inconsistencies. The operations consisting in ordering legal materials in light of a set of underlying principles are finally examined.

不能約

小故事

gene-therapy