Titlebook: Argument Structure:; Representation and T James B. Freeman Book 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011 Argument.Argument Diagrammin

Increment

Argument Structure and Disciplinary Perspective: The Linked-Convergent Versus Multiple-Co-ordinativl evaluation of arguments. If one convergent premise is unacceptable, the remaining premises may still be acceptable and adequate grounds for the conclusion. But if a linked premise is unacceptable, the entire reason of which it is a factor is unacceptable. Keeping these two pairs of distinctions se

Incorporate

,The Linked-Convergent Distinction–Refining the Criterion,ion for making the linked-convergent distinction. We criticize a number of tests for making the distinction as involving counterintuitive or anomalous results because they apply semantic considerations to do a syntactic job. We argue that recognizing that premises may function as counter-defeaters i

Ergots

陰郁

四目在模仿

James B. FreemanComprehensive dialectical theory representing argument structures incorporating Toulmin model insights.Defends the linked-convergent distinction in depth, responding to virtually all recent critics in

設想

Argumentation Libraryhttp://image.papertrans.cn/b/image/161522.jpg

Odyssey

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-77922-3circles and arrows due to Beardsley and Thomas from Toulmin’s layout of arguments. Although Thomas has shown how the standard approach may accommodate arguments with suppositions, representing the structure of arguments replying to objections needs extension of the method through incorporating eleme

故意釣到白楊

GRIEF

暫時別動