Titlebook: Argument Evaluation and Evidence; Douglas Walton Book 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016 Abductive Reasoning.Antiphon

指責(zé)

書目名稱Argument Evaluation and Evidence影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Argument Evaluation and Evidence影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Argument Evaluation and Evidence網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Argument Evaluation and Evidence網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Argument Evaluation and Evidence被引頻次




書目名稱Argument Evaluation and Evidence被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Argument Evaluation and Evidence年度引用




書目名稱Argument Evaluation and Evidence年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Argument Evaluation and Evidence讀者反饋




書目名稱Argument Evaluation and Evidence讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

paragon

Christoph Luetge,Matthias Uhl,Hannes Ruschnations contain reasoning, (2) to show how arguments and explanations are woven together in evidential reasoning, (3) to introduce the form of argument called inference to the best explanation, (4) and to show the importance of this form of reasoning for the study of evidential reasoning and argumentation.

decode

Predigest

CHANT

Introduction to Argument and Explanation,nations contain reasoning, (2) to show how arguments and explanations are woven together in evidential reasoning, (3) to introduce the form of argument called inference to the best explanation, (4) and to show the importance of this form of reasoning for the study of evidential reasoning and argumentation.

artless

Inference to the Best Explanation, pro-contra argumentation used in evidential reasoning in a criminal trial of a highly typical sort. The chapter offers the beginnings of a solution to the technical problem of combining argument and explanation in such cases, pointing the way forward to Chap. ., where a method of evaluating explanations is built up.

commensurate

vasculitis

https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137409805odel to determine whether what the expert says is acceptable or not. One of the critical questions raises the issue of trust, and a central problem is to determine how the other critical questions fit with this one. The chapter studies how trust is related to argument from expert opinion in formal computational argumentation models.

ALIBI

Materials, Materiality, New Materialism,on tools to enable us to judge whether a given instance is a reasonable argument or not and how to adjudicate cases where an allegation of drawing a hasty conclusion or even committing a fallacy is made.

Preamble