Titlebook: Argument Encoding in Japanese Conversation; Mitsuaki Shimojo Book 2005 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2005

Intermediary

書(shū)目名稱Argument Encoding in Japanese Conversation影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱Argument Encoding in Japanese Conversation影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Argument Encoding in Japanese Conversation網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱Argument Encoding in Japanese Conversation網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Argument Encoding in Japanese Conversation被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱Argument Encoding in Japanese Conversation被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Argument Encoding in Japanese Conversation年度引用




書(shū)目名稱Argument Encoding in Japanese Conversation年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Argument Encoding in Japanese Conversation讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱Argument Encoding in Japanese Conversation讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

intellect

PET-scan

The Six Argument Encoding Types as a System,re summarized in Table 6.1. Concerning anaphoric saliency, three types are identified: (i) an encoding type associated with saliency (i.e. smaller RD) — zero anaphor, (ii) those associated with nonsaliency (i.e. larger RD) — . and o, and (iii) those associated with ambivalent saliency — wa, the zero

嘮叨

Conclusions,ertaking, it was necessary to elucidate the following two properties: the defining function of each encoding type and the interplay of the encoding types in the system. The analyses presented throughout — both qualitative and quantitative — have shown that both of the properties above are important

思鄉(xiāng)病

Indict

Jo A. M. Van den Biggelaar,Florenci Serrasrecorded for the purpose of the present study. Each pair’s conversation is 30 minutes long; the entire data consists of four hours of conversation in total. The overall procedures for data collection follow Maynard (1989: 13–15) and are summarized as follows.

蓋他為秘密

Experimental Embryology of Gymnosperms,re summarized in Table 6.1. Concerning anaphoric saliency, three types are identified: (i) an encoding type associated with saliency (i.e. smaller RD) — zero anaphor, (ii) those associated with nonsaliency (i.e. larger RD) — . and o, and (iii) those associated with ambivalent saliency — wa, the zero

debase

Affection

Maximize