Titlebook: ArgentinaAustralia And Canada; Studies In Comparati D. C. M. Platt (economic historian),Guido Tella Book 1985 Palgrave Macmillan, a divisio

–吃

extemporaneous

Lamina

Maricela González,Paula Caffarenaons of recent settlement’, in Hilgerdt’s phrase — the value of bringing the three together is obvious, and it is perhaps surprising that it has not been done before (although two at a time have indeed been compared).

Insensate

CHIP

Seymour Wapner,Saul B. Cohen,Bernard Kaplan. In fact, the natural increase of population for both Buenos Aires and Montreal put them in a class of their own; the rates of increase for Buenos Aires of 18.66 per 1000 and of 18.22 for Montreal shortly before the First World War, were several points ahead of any other city.

Amenable

FIG

,The State and the Provision of Electricity in Canada and Australia, 1880–1965,oducts.. Populated almost entirely by Europeans, mainly of British stock, the two former British colonies share political traditions and governmental forms which underlie their federal and parliamentary systems. Thus it is only natural to expect that there should be certain, marked institutional similarities between the two countries.

假設(shè)

Introduction,At the very least, we assume that the experience of one of those countries can supply a better understanding of some aspects, whether historical, economic, or political, of another. Contrasts are as useful as direct comparisons. In the case of the three countries selected — typical examples of ‘regi

瑣碎

喚起

Rents, Quasi-Rents, Normal Profits and Growth: Argentina and the Areas of Recent Settlement,is, the United States, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Argentina, and South Africa (not to mention the notoriously similar, but neglected, case of Russia’s Siberia). These countries and their development over the last century have some very interesting problems in common, although individual interpr