Titlebook: Archaeology in Society; Its Relevance in the Marcy Rockman,Joe Flatman Textbook 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012 Archaeologic

Orthosis

書目名稱Archaeology in Society影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Archaeology in Society影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Archaeology in Society網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Archaeology in Society網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Archaeology in Society被引頻次




書目名稱Archaeology in Society被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Archaeology in Society年度引用




書目名稱Archaeology in Society年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Archaeology in Society讀者反饋




書目名稱Archaeology in Society讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

污穢

打折

Marcy Rockman,Joe FlatmanAddresses issue of archaeology‘s contribution to the public and public knowledge.Contains unique format of conversations between archaeologists with differing views on the field.Includes both academic

共同生活

intercede

Sophie Ruckau,Joseph He?,Aniko R?sch-Lehmann as having something readily useful and important to contribute to topics at hand. This chapter introduces the topic of relevance for the volume, reviews other recent archaeological writings on the relevance theme, and sets out a vision for the role of archaeology in public policy at the US federal

TEM

Gemeinschaften der Festivalbesucher, experiences with different projects, and generally describe what “works” and what does not in the present-day archaeological “marketplace.” Drawing from their varied professional experiences, the authors highlight those aspects of archaeological work that tend to go smoothly – and also where proble

infinite

Einleitung: Event und Eventisierung,h such policies, principles and laws relate to the larger visions of those in charge of the legislation that require such work. Considering the history and development of cultural resource management in UK and USA in particular, the authors discuss which aspects of cultural resource management regul

Silent-Ischemia

Canyon

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-21887-7from their professional experience, the authors consider aspects of archaeology that are particularly conducive to public involvement, as well as those that are not. The authors consider in particular situations they have encountered where their role as “professional” archaeologists have sometimes b

MIRE

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-21887-7ers, the authors discuss both the opportunities and constraints that they have experienced in academia (including the relationship of academia to industry), consider their primary considerations – and motivations – as they develop their programs of research, and discuss what is expected from their r