Titlebook: Aquinas’s Philosophical Commentary on the Ethics; A Historical Perspec James C. Doig Book 2001 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 20

大腦

書目名稱Aquinas’s Philosophical Commentary on the Ethics影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Aquinas’s Philosophical Commentary on the Ethics影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Aquinas’s Philosophical Commentary on the Ethics網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Aquinas’s Philosophical Commentary on the Ethics網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學科排名




書目名稱Aquinas’s Philosophical Commentary on the Ethics被引頻次




書目名稱Aquinas’s Philosophical Commentary on the Ethics被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Aquinas’s Philosophical Commentary on the Ethics年度引用




書目名稱Aquinas’s Philosophical Commentary on the Ethics年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Aquinas’s Philosophical Commentary on the Ethics讀者反饋




書目名稱Aquinas’s Philosophical Commentary on the Ethics讀者反饋學科排名

清真寺

1879-8578 a presentation of the foundation of Aquinas‘s moralphilosophy? Professor Doig answers these questions through anexamination of the historical context within which the .Sententia.was composed. .In Chapters 1-2, the work‘s role as a corrective of earliercommentaries is established. Chapter 3, by exami

EVADE

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-49777-6 human happiness. However, if the . were intended, as is so often claimed, as a theological transformation of Aristotle’s philosophical text, would Aquinas have been so intent on exposing the correct meaning of the .?

廚師

Immobilize

insert

BOAST

Lisa Schiefele,Stefanie Bohn,Simon Sachsproposed a philosophical interpretation of the .. In the present Chapter, I propose to examine the grounds which appear to have provided the greatest support for concluding that the . is a theological work. In this regard, Jaffa’s comparative study of the . and the . provides a useful focus.

使習慣于

思想

faultfinder

Dating the ,,roposed the . as having itself been written somewhat later than previously thought.. Consequently, Gauthier now dates the . after early 1271 and the . after the summer ofthat year, thus late 1271–1272. Yet Gauthier’s original dates of 1271–1272 for the ., as well as its posteriority relative to the ., continue to stand..