Titlebook: Antarctica and the Humanities; Roberts Peder,Lize-Marié van der Watt,Adrian Howki Book 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s

配置

genuine

易彎曲

geometrician

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-52233-8tarctica, perhaps with the aid of flying saucers—to explore the relationship between physical and imagined geographies. I am not concerned with the “truth” of the theory: empirical evidence clearly indicates it is not, and there is ample reason to regard it as a useful piece of propaganda for the ne

sacrum

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-52233-8 in descriptions of the continent not only reflects the appearance of its topography, but also the changing values associated with ‘whiteness’ as a racial trope. The chapter focuses on how apartheid South Africa constructed Antarctica as a white continent, particularly a white continent for men. It

啜泣

Wilhelm Patterson,Wolfgang Standkent, objects alien to the continent that must be removed, or as cultural heritage that needs to be preserved. For this reason, artefacts of potentially great importance for understanding and explaining the history of Antarctica are removed, while sites of arguably lesser universal value are preserved

Middle-Ear

,Berichtigter S?ttigungsgrad ,,,itiques the idea of Antarctica as a whole or unified space, illuminating the imperial Cold War, and geopolitical projects behind such visions, and the implications of ‘global commons’ projects for Antarctica. In contrast to these visions, this chapter explores the experiences and contours of place a

火車車輪

統(tǒng)治人類

Lacerate

Wilhelm Sturtzel,Hermann Schmidt-Stiebitzn “what does it mean to write history in a continent for science?” the essay examines some of the challenges and opportunities for historical scholarship in Antarctica. The dominance of the scientific paradigm imposes a number of constraints on historical research, but it also presents historians wi