Titlebook: Annals of Theoretical Psychology; Daniel N. Robinson,Leendert P. Mos Book 1990 Plenum Press, New York 1990 Action.Theoretical Psychology.p

Infuriate

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38759-4iptive or explanatory literature about action that is essentially uncontested or so rigorously assembled that a would-be scientific psychology testing the prospect of covering laws for the entire domain would feel bound to accommodate its findings. On the contrary, the very propriety of attempting t

Flu表流動(dòng)

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38759-4ave developed their theoretical conceptions and methodology based on that assumption. This mistake has been compounded by the fact that psychologists implicitly accepted an older interpretation of the natural sciences that in many respects is untenable and that has been superseded by more sophistica

審問,審訊

十字架

Scotland: The Scottish School Systemg a theory for that something. But before we can go on to examine whether this is a viable simplification of our intellectual activities we should notice that while it is widely acknowledged that ‘explanation’ is a multivocal concept little attention has been paid to possible equivocations in the co

不來

Educational Challenges for a New Century-defined scientific undertakings. From among these, Harré comments extensively upon what he refers to as the ‘Herzian’ mode, according to which a theoretical-explanatory account of a phenomenon involves the postulation of unobservable entities or mechanisms which could be claimed to ‘generate’ the p