Titlebook: Animals, Political Liberalism and Public Reason; Federico Zuolo Book 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive

突然

書目名稱Animals, Political Liberalism and Public Reason影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Animals, Political Liberalism and Public Reason影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Animals, Political Liberalism and Public Reason網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Animals, Political Liberalism and Public Reason網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Animals, Political Liberalism and Public Reason被引頻次




書目名稱Animals, Political Liberalism and Public Reason被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Animals, Political Liberalism and Public Reason年度引用




書目名稱Animals, Political Liberalism and Public Reason年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Animals, Political Liberalism and Public Reason讀者反饋




書目名稱Animals, Political Liberalism and Public Reason讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

易受騙

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3367-9eness. To strengthen the epistemic pedigree of the discussed views, the procedure includes two norms (formal epistemic norm and substantive epistemic norm) to establish which views are minimally rationally acceptable.

使服水土

剝削

使困惑

anesthesia

Recess

nautical

The ‘Unconquerable Private Interests’g animals’ interests in life, in freedom and in welfare. The procedure of public justification yields a conclusive outcome only with regard to the principles protecting animals’ interests in welfare, while in the other two families we have inconclusive outcomes. In these cases, we have to employ majoritarian democratic procedures.

jarring

Magisterial

Introduction,so far neglected both in political philosophy and in animal ethics, despite the recent political turn in animal ethics. It concludes by clarifying the scope of the analysis (the domain of sentient beings) and by defending a sentience-based account of moral considerability.