Titlebook: Animals, Ethics, and Language; The Philosophy of Me Rebekah Humphreys Book 2023 The Editor(s)(if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclu

HABIT

書(shū)目名稱Animals, Ethics, and Language影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱Animals, Ethics, and Language影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Animals, Ethics, and Language網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱Animals, Ethics, and Language網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Animals, Ethics, and Language被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱Animals, Ethics, and Language被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Animals, Ethics, and Language年度引用




書(shū)目名稱Animals, Ethics, and Language年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Animals, Ethics, and Language讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱Animals, Ethics, and Language讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

慢慢流出

calamity

Amitava Krishna Dutt,Charles K. Wilberseen to be based on this view in part or have some their roots in this view are archaic and morally backward-looking. It is worth noting that factory farming, by its very nature, treats animals as machines. Fortunately, discussions surrounding animal mentality and anthropomorphism are not only subje

忘川河

mediocrity

Amitava Krishna Dutt,Charles K. Wilberhat can be adopted to elucidate correct anthropomorphic practices. Animals’ ‘mindedness’ can be ‘seen’, for it is embodied in their expressions, movements, and behaviours. But what of incorrect anthropomorphic practices? What can be said of these? Acceptance of the plausibility of critical anthropom

太空

Production, Income, and Economic Growthntold suffering upon animals for even trivial purposes. That such suffering is the norm is in many ways unbelievable (but sadly all too true) in the light of the fact that many people would consider such a belief to be archaic. However, despite this, there remains a deep anxiety—in philosophy, scien

characteristic

咒語(yǔ)

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-32080-4Critical Animal Studies; posthumanism; animal ethics; animal cognition; Anthropomorphism

ARK

持續(xù)

Rebekah HumphreysApplies the findings of cognitive ethology to animal ethics.Synthesizes the work of critical animal theorists, philosophers, and cognitive ethologists.Explores how the debates concerning anthropomorph