Titlebook: Animals, Equality and Democracy; Siobhan O’Sullivan Book 2011 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2011 communit

聰明

Mutter

,What’s Good for the Goose Should Also be Good for the Gander,ralism at certain points in time. They reveal much more about a particular theorist’s personal bias than they do about liberalism as a political framework. Liberal principles have been successfully deployed for the benefit of so many marginal others; others with whom the ruling class did not wish to

壟斷

optional

Introduction,cab-horse, declares ‘My doctrine is this, that if we see cruelty or wrong that we have the power to stop, and do nothing, we make ourselves sharers in the guilt’.. I believe that most people would echo those sentiments and step in to stop cruelty to an animal if they were to see it. I don’t detect s

acrobat

兒童

蒙太奇

Animal Visibility,, prompted by the 2001 foot-and-mouth disease epidemic, distressing and distasteful. However, as he rightly points out, the big difference between what occurred in that case and what happens to animals every other day is that foot-and-mouth disease generated wide media interest. So, on that particul

Spinal-Tap

立即

,What’s Good for the Goose Should Also be Good for the Gander, the ‘humanitarians’ had the last laugh. I share his optimism. I am highly suspicious of claims that liberalism is an inherently anti-animal framework or that we must look to an entirely new political paradigm to comprehensively protect the interests of animals. Robert Garner may be correct when he

Hiatal-Hernia

Conclusion,reated in 1822 and have remained biased to the present day. I have termed this type of bias ‘the internal inconsistency’. It is internal because it tells us nothing about how we manage animals compared to humans. It only exposes problems with the way we treat animals in comparison to other animals.