Titlebook: Analytical Theory of Democracy; History, Mathematics Andranik Tangian Book 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020 Arrow‘s Paradox.Condorc

陶瓷

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14160-7, American and Polish Revolutions. At the same time, the Enlightenment left a historical puzzle. Although both of its leading political thinkers, Montesquieu and Rousseau, explicitly linked selection of magistrates by lot to democracy and election by vote to aristocracy, the post- Enlightenment demo

卷發(fā)

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14160-7nment. Although its founders explicitly contrasted it with democracy, the modern representative governments as practiced in industrialized countries today are commonly interpreted as democracies, primarily due to universal suffrage. This chapter describes the transformations in understanding democra

大方不好

Disruptive Technology Enhanced Learning. The democratic institutions are evaluated using indices of popularity (average percentage of the population represented on a number of issues), universality (frequency of cases when the majority opinion is represented) and goodness (average of the group-represented-to-majority ratio). The indices

可能性

Disruptive Technology Enhanced Learningrbitrarily changing social situation. In its original formulation, the model implies the existence of a dictator, or, an individual whose preference always coincides with that of the society. Using the indices of popularity and universality introduced, it is shown that there are always ‘good’ Arrow’

詞匯記憶方法

A Taxonomy of FinTech Innovation,rties that took part in the election are analyzed from the viewpoint of policy representation, or virtual direct democracy. For this purpose, the parties’ positions on 38 topical policy issues are compared with the results of relevant public opinion polls. Then the parties’ indices of popularity (th

companion