Titlebook: An Expressive Theory of Punishment; Bill Wringe Book 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016 argue.crime.philosophy.soci

奇思怪想

GUISE

BLAZE

capsule

Durchführung der Plankalkulationunt of punishment that I gave in Part I was limited in one very important respect: it dealt only with what I call ‘paradigmatic’ cases of punishment — in other words, cases where an individual is punished by members of a political community for offenses for which he or she has already been found gui

Herd-Immunity

Perp Walks as Punishmentunt of punishment that I gave in Part I was limited in one very important respect: it dealt only with what I call ‘paradigmatic’ cases of punishment — in other words, cases where an individual is punished by members of a political community for offenses for which he or she has already been found gui

言外之意

Initial

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-01902-2e that view attractive. My aim in this chapter is to do precisely that: I shall argue that there are good reasons for incorporating considerations about the expressive function of punishment. If we do so, we can avoid a problem which some recent authors have taken to stand in the way of any attempt

消毒

免除責(zé)任

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-86343-1nd the agent doing the expression. As we have seen they may also differ about the audience (if any) to whom the message is expressed. In Chapter 3, I outlined a denunciatory account of punishment, on which the intended recipients of the message which punishment communicates are the members of the so

踉蹌