Titlebook: An Aristotelian Feminism; Sarah Borden Sharkey Book 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016 Aristotelian feminism.hylomorp

Bone-Scan

不真

Why Aristotle Was Not a Feminist,f his thought in the rise of the empirical sciences. His influence on views of women, however, has been less sanguine. Aristotle not only describes women as (as it were) deformed and misbegotten males; he also understands women as incapable of fully actualizing that feature most distinctive to human beings: our rationality.

single

2509-4793 help address significant social issues.Offers the first sub.This book articulates the theoretical outlines of a feminism developed from Aristotle’s metaphysics, making a new contribution to feminist theory. Readers will discover why Aristotle was not a feminist and how he might have become one, thr

聲音刺耳

Landwirtschaftliche Bodenbearbeitungdiscussed in Chap. .), it cannot be put to significant use until developed in a bit more detail. My goal in this chapter is not to fill in the position, but simply to point to a few of the places where that filling in would need to occur and indicate briefly how different ways of answering certain questions would affect the general position.

刪除

Interlocking

Book 2016ological determinations..Although written for theorists, this scholarly yet accessiblebook can be used to address more practical issues and the final chapter explores women in universities as one example. This book will appeal to both feminists with limited familiarity with Aristotle’s philosophy, a

發(fā)源

Nussbaum, Capabilities, and Biology,lity in terms of job opportunities or distribution of particular resources (as important as these may be), but to . and the full set of conditions relevant to the development and full use of these capacities.

Mets552

An Aristotelian Account of Sex and Gender, said to share something significant and yet also so obviously and truly differ. All of us, according to Aristotle, share the same type of form—or principle of growth and development—and yet also differ in ways that are not insignificant. These differences are due to our differing material condition

FUSE

How Aristotle Might Have Become a Feminist,lopment of women and men. In this chapter, I would like to address each of these four areas, showing how the claims Aristotle actually made were neither the only, nor the best, positions an Aristotelian could take. That is, were Aristotle more fully Aristotelian, he may not have made the mistakes th

共和國(guó)

2509-4793 can be used to address more practical issues and the final chapter explores women in universities as one example. This book will appeal to both feminists with limited familiarity with Aristotle’s philosophy, a978-3-319-80669-3978-3-319-29847-4Series ISSN 2509-4793 Series E-ISSN 2509-4807