找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: An Analysis of Rights; Samuel Stoljar Book 1984 S. J. Stoljar 1984 human rights.law.politics.social science.sociology

[復制鏈接]
樓主: 空格
31#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 22:30:53 | 只看該作者
Rights and Duties,Normative relationships, whether moral or legal or both, thus break up into dual components in that two-party relations have to include a right on the one hand with a duty on the other. It would be pointless to say that a person . do something without there being other people related to that ‘may’;
32#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 02:34:37 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-30560-7nant, or the right to compete in trade, or the right to picket.. We shall call these defensive rights, sometimes called liberties or liberty-rights, to distinguish them from rights with correlative duties or fully assertive rights.
33#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 08:54:59 | 只看該作者
Mike Pedler,Tom Boydell,John Burgoynehole, but with the object of re-examining, as it happens very critically, his three central themes: (a) his distinction between claims and liberties, (b) his views of the ‘no-right’, as he called a liberty’s correlative, and (c) his views of powers and immunities.
34#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 09:44:28 | 只看該作者
35#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 15:23:57 | 只看該作者
,Tod eines Soldaten / Tod eines M?rtyrers, limb refer to a person’s physical or mental integrity: he is to be free from compulsion or other avoidable interference, whereas the right to property extends this immunity to things, or assets, sometimes opportunities.
36#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 18:40:09 | 只看該作者
37#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 23:06:22 | 只看該作者
38#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 03:19:23 | 只看該作者
From Positive to Natural Rights,ight which is contained in a ‘literary’ source, be this an oral tradition or a written law, sources through which positive rights thus declare their existence, the sources being those which the institutional operators recognise as authoritative.
39#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 08:14:46 | 只看該作者
40#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 14:20:58 | 只看該作者
The Limits of Rights,ally handicapped who lack the intellectual capacity even to appreciate rights? Still it has long been accepted, both in law and morals, that a child has rights just as has the lunatic. What we have to discuss is why, theoretically, this should be so.
 關于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-6 04:46
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
永顺县| 盐源县| 嘉善县| 河东区| 凌云县| 长寿区| 辽宁省| 揭西县| 叶城县| 兰溪市| 泰顺县| 姜堰市| 丹东市| 鄂尔多斯市| 陇川县| 鄂托克旗| 卓资县| 龙里县| 农安县| 长宁县| 武邑县| 青州市| 尼木县| 南涧| 清徐县| 沂水县| 栾川县| 南华县| 固安县| 东丰县| 泰州市| 新营市| 隆化县| 冕宁县| 新余市| 夏津县| 竹山县| 涪陵区| 朝阳市| 太仓市| 沁水县|