找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: An African Ethics of Personhood and Bioethics; A Reflection on Abor Motsamai Molefe Book 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(

[復制鏈接]
樓主: HIV763
11#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 11:22:34 | 只看該作者
Personhood and Abortion in African Philosophy, is whether the idea of personhood would permit or forbid abortion. He ultimately defends the view that forbids abortion. To secure this conclusion, he structures the chapter as follows. He begins with questions of methodology. He first proposes what he takes to be a suitable method to engage on the
12#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 16:06:32 | 只看該作者
Personhood and Euthanasia in African Philosophy,chapter as follows. In the first section, he begins by defining crucial terms and proceeds to contextualise the discussion in light of the South African legal literature on the question of euthanasia. In the second section, Molefe propounds an account of a good death in the light of personhood by co
13#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 19:35:22 | 只看該作者
Personhood and Abortion in African Philosophy,ers arguments that neutralise Horsthemke’s arguments by proposing a more plausible interpretation of Menkiti’s moral philosophy that accommodates the young in the moral community, among others. Finally, Molefe considers two possible objections against his view.
14#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 00:27:46 | 只看該作者
that it is permissible for reasons revolving around avoiding the reversing of personhood. It also, though, minimally, touches on the questions regarding the mentally disabled and animals, to which it assigns lower moral status..978-3-030-46521-6978-3-030-46519-3
15#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 05:36:35 | 只看該作者
16#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 07:33:22 | 只看該作者
Book 2020it concludes that it is impermissible since foetuses possess partial moral status. Regarding euthanasia, it argues that it is permissible for reasons revolving around avoiding the reversing of personhood. It also, though, minimally, touches on the questions regarding the mentally disabled and animals, to which it assigns lower moral status..
17#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 12:51:19 | 只看該作者
18#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 14:52:57 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6477-7ood in African philosophy and it further explores their relation to the idea of moral status or dignity. The second section considers the literature related to the bioethical themes of abortion and euthanasia since these will be the focus of the book. Finally, it discusses the structure of the book.
19#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 19:51:40 | 只看該作者
20#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 00:47:54 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-9 23:18
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
万年县| 扎囊县| 南丹县| 开鲁县| 镇远县| 栾川县| 行唐县| 吉首市| 兴义市| 盐城市| 桑植县| 辽宁省| 罗平县| 绩溪县| 怀化市| 秦安县| 年辖:市辖区| 清徐县| 海南省| 云和县| 韶关市| 福泉市| 贡山| 凌源市| 西昌市| 定日县| 桃江县| 岳阳市| 千阳县| 沧源| 密云县| 商河县| 二连浩特市| 大丰市| 车致| 宣化县| 长寿区| 扎囊县| 佛山市| 宜城市| 嘉善县|