找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: America in the Philippines, 1899-1902; The First Torture Sc Christopher J. Einolf Book 2014 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Nature Americ

[復制鏈接]
樓主: 故障
31#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 22:13:58 | 只看該作者
,The Scandal Recedes, May–June 1902,rs of the Senate Committee on the Philippines, to a front-page scandal that inspired speeches on the floor of the full Senate. The debate continued throughout the month of May, repeating lines of argument from the previous month and adding a few new ones. These new arguments included an accountabili
32#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 03:57:36 | 只看該作者
The Effects of the Scandal,investigated and court-martialed in 1902 and 1903. Few officers’ careers suffered as a result, and most pro-imperialist politicians, including Roosevelt, won reelection. However, the scandal had a long-term effect on both American imperialist policy and the way the military carried out that policy.
33#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 06:25:20 | 只看該作者
34#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 10:23:49 | 只看該作者
35#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 16:00:41 | 只看該作者
Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Nature America Inc. 2014
36#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 21:29:51 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-08386-3 defines torture and provides an overview of its history; it then examines existing literature on its causes. It concludes with a discussion of the literature on the nature of human rights debate, both how advocates make charges of human rights abuses and how governments defend themselves.
37#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 22:33:21 | 只看該作者
Theories of Human Rights Abuses and Advocacy, defines torture and provides an overview of its history; it then examines existing literature on its causes. It concludes with a discussion of the literature on the nature of human rights debate, both how advocates make charges of human rights abuses and how governments defend themselves.
38#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 06:07:11 | 只看該作者
39#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 07:07:17 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-08386-3 defines torture and provides an overview of its history; it then examines existing literature on its causes. It concludes with a discussion of the literature on the nature of human rights debate, both how advocates make charges of human rights abuses and how governments defend themselves.
40#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 11:33:34 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-16 21:36
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
普陀区| 大洼县| 当雄县| 中牟县| 图木舒克市| 临西县| 屏山县| 衡南县| 普格县| 龙里县| 曲靖市| 青岛市| 昌吉市| 贡觉县| 瑞昌市| 高雄市| 黑龙江省| 视频| 内乡县| 康乐县| 陆河县| 福州市| 平乡县| 嘉祥县| 锡林郭勒盟| 民乐县| 江西省| 桦川县| 章丘市| 梁平县| 军事| 柳林县| 池州市| 和平县| 丹巴县| 藁城市| 胶南市| 南陵县| 莱西市| 昌乐县| 德昌县|