Titlebook: Alvin Plantinga; James E. Tomberlin,Peter Inwagen Book 1985 D. Reidel Publishing Company 1985 discourse.epistemology.freedom.knowledge.phi

Pert敏捷

Plantinga and the Ontological Argumentrked by an intriguing turn — in . [12] he examines a number of variants of the argument and concludes that they arc one and all unsuccessful; but in his more recent . [13] and . [14], Plantinga offers what he takes to be a sound ontological argument. In what follows, I shall survey and evaluate Plan

蠟燭

Plantinga on Foreknowledge and freedombulk of Plantinga’s discussion is an attempt to show the unsoundness of an argument constructed by Nelson Pike to establish the inconsistency of a certain version of the doctrine of divine foreknowledge with the claim that some human actions are voluntary. In the first section of this paper, I shall

B-cell

Plantinga’s Epistemology of Religious Belief his treatment of arguments for the existence of God or of the problem of evil. No doubt, his discussion of these matters can be seen as contributing to the development of an epistemology of religious belief. Thus the final upshot of .. is that sincc the topological argument, the best argument for t