找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Alternative Logics. Do Sciences Need Them?; Paul Weingartner Book 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004 Combinatory Logic.Interpreta

[復制鏈接]
查看: 14354|回復: 58
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 19:36:17 | 只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
期刊全稱Alternative Logics. Do Sciences Need Them?
影響因子2023Paul Weingartner
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/155/154085/154085.mp4
發(fā)行地址This is a thorough review..For many years nothing of that kind has been published..But the logical concepts to be used in various disciplines is heavily discussed in the more specialized treatises..He
圖書封面Titlebook: Alternative Logics. Do Sciences Need Them?;  Paul Weingartner Book 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004 Combinatory Logic.Interpreta
影響因子.Initially proposed as rivals of classical logic, alternative logics have become increasingly important in sciences such as quantum physics, computer science, and artificial intelligence. The contributions collected in this volume address and explore the question whether the usage of logic in the sciences, especially in modern physics, requires a deviation from classical mathematical logic. The articles in the first part of the book set the scene by describing the context and the dilemma when applying logic in science. In part II the authors offer several logics that deviate in different ways from classical logics. The twelve papers in part III investigate in detail specific aspects such as quantum logic, quantum computation, computer-science considerations, praxic logic, and quantum probability. Most of the contributions are revised and partially extended versions of papers presented at a conference of the same title of the Académie Internationale de Philosophie des Sciences held at the Internationales Forschungszentrum Salzburg in May 1999. Others have been added to complete the picture of recent research in alternative logics?as they?have been developed for applications in the s
Pindex Book 2004
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Alternative Logics. Do Sciences Need Them?影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Alternative Logics. Do Sciences Need Them?影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Alternative Logics. Do Sciences Need Them?網(wǎng)絡公開度




書目名稱Alternative Logics. Do Sciences Need Them?網(wǎng)絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱Alternative Logics. Do Sciences Need Them?被引頻次




書目名稱Alternative Logics. Do Sciences Need Them?被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Alternative Logics. Do Sciences Need Them?年度引用




書目名稱Alternative Logics. Do Sciences Need Them?年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Alternative Logics. Do Sciences Need Them?讀者反饋




書目名稱Alternative Logics. Do Sciences Need Them?讀者反饋學科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 22:19:24 | 只看該作者
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 02:28:22 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-44736-8etaphysics. From the beginning we encounter a mess of difficulties. If we focus our attention on the meaning of the term, we shall find that it is polysemic. Some of its significations are obscure, and not a few even absurd.
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 05:22:01 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-44736-8vent or relativity and quantum theories, had occurred which clearly upset much of what has become known as classical physics. But these new theories seemed to carry much more in the way of implications. For not only the classical scientific theories, but also the classical philosophies which attempt
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 11:37:19 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 14:51:57 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 20:41:10 | 只看該作者
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 22:39:56 | 只看該作者
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 03:51:41 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-45860-9 more adequate than classical propositional and first-order logics. Not surprisingly, answering this question usually amounts to a trade-off between the expressive power of the new logic (usually stronger than the expressive power of classical logic) and its decidability properties (usually weaker).
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 08:58:52 | 只看該作者
Diamagnetic bulk susceptibility data of CF4,ocedures in the wider sense of self-consistency, adequacy and interconnections between various schemes of thought. This is a reasonable point of view if we accept Peirce’s claim that “according to its nature [logic] is forced to proceed with its research into the condition of reality itself and in d
 關于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-11-2 23:51
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
肃南| 曲阜市| 河东区| 巴南区| 金华市| 六盘水市| 天台县| 东乌| 太白县| 夏邑县| 任丘市| 车致| 靖安县| 武胜县| 南岸区| 古蔺县| 大邑县| 海伦市| 荥阳市| 江油市| 比如县| 改则县| 疏勒县| 西乡县| 鄂托克旗| 昔阳县| 古交市| 盱眙县| 郴州市| 左权县| 奉化市| 阳泉市| 姚安县| 扎鲁特旗| 龙游县| 巧家县| 土默特左旗| 永登县| 无极县| 庆云县| 康保县|