Titlebook: Alaska’s Permanent Fund Dividend; Examining Its Suitab Karl Widerquist,Michael W. Howard Book 2012 Karl Widerquist and Michael W. Howard 20

四指套

eucalyptus

GEAR

https://doi.org/10.1007/b101863ns, on the other. Right-libertarians favor private property rights and market freedoms, and are opposed to any form of redistributive taxation. Left-libertarians similarly favor private property rights and market freedoms, but argue that these rights and freedoms are not incompatible with redistribu

Ordnance

Nilesh R. Marathe,Subhash K. Shindeon for the implementation of basic income schemes in other US states and other countries. In this chapter, I question the characterization of the PFD as either a basic income or a robust model for one. I argue instead that the PFD is a ., a form of redistribution that is related to, but not synonymo

ULCER

Data Communications Fundamentals,e PFD’s political successes are well-documented,. as are its financial returns; residents have received $1,400 per year on average over the past decade from state oil revenues.. Other contributors to this volume query whether the “Alaska model” is fit for export and adaptation in other US jurisdicti

蒸發(fā)

painkillers

Error Correcting and Detecting Codes, raises significant ethical questions. How can we fund a basic income ethically? This chapter inserts itself between two judgments expressed by Karl Widerquist and Michael Howard, the editors of this volume. First they suggest we should fund basic income by taxing natural resource appropriation. The

calumniate

陳腐的人

Alaska’s Permanent Fund Dividend978-1-137-01502-0Series ISSN 2662-3803 Series E-ISSN 2662-3811

諄諄教誨

https://doi.org/10.1007/b101863rn from us. But in the course of researching this book, we have learned quite a bit about Alaska’s fund and dividend, and we would like to respond to some of the issues brought up so far and make a few simple recommendations.