Titlebook: Agreement in Argumentation; A Discursive Perspec Francesca Santulli,Chiara Degano Book 2022 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)

土坯

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-44478-5esident, is analyzed. Argument reconstruction is combined with a discourse perspective, against the backdrop of both contextual factors and generic traits. The main argumentative schemes exploited by the candidates are singled out, namely arguments from: alternatives, value-based practical reasoning

沙漠

技術(shù)

減弱不好

Book 2022nd beliefs leads to the creation of a common ground between the speaker and the audience in the pursuit of persuasion. In the first part of the book, the authors examine agreement from a historical and theoretical perspective, setting in relation major ancient and contemporary approaches to argument

輕率看法

monochromatic

Agreement: An Argumentation Perspective,s off with a discussion of the opening stage of the critical discussion model, as the one most inherently related to agreement. It is the stage dedicated to establishing starting points, i.e. facts and values that are, or are cast as, objects of agreement which are exploited argumentatively. In real

托運(yùn)

磨碎

The Presidential Announcement: Building Agreement on Disagreement,formative act of announcing the decision to run for the Presidency, offering reasons for the choice. For this research, the attention has focused on the seven challenging candidates who managed to win the elections from 1960 to 2010. The diachronic approach, combined with the selection of candidates

細(xì)胞

ANTH

A Presidential Debate: Exploiting Agreement in an Adversarial Context,esident, is analyzed. Argument reconstruction is combined with a discourse perspective, against the backdrop of both contextual factors and generic traits. The main argumentative schemes exploited by the candidates are singled out, namely arguments from: alternatives, value-based practical reasoning