Titlebook: Agents and Multi-Agent Systems Formalisms, Methodologies, and Applications; Based on the AI‘97 W Wayne Wobcke,Maurice Pagnucco,Chengqi Zhan

Annotate

Wayne Wobcke,Maurice Pagnucco,Chengqi ZhangIncludes supplementary material:

biosphere

B-cell

Culture, Practice, and the Bodyescribe the effects of actions on the world and on the mental states of agents; and the concurrent, logic programming language ConGolog to specify the actions performed by each agent. Since ConGolog has a well-defined semantics, the specifications can be used to reason about the behavior of individu

Orthodontics

III. Conversational organization: The basicsents will, in general, have neither the information nor the time available to compute an entire joint plan before beginning to work. It proposes that cooperating agents need therefore only reason about what to do .; what represents a .. Thus, agents literally .: a plan only unfolds as cooperation co

規(guī)范要多

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-04606-2ecution of the action never fails. Similarly, logical theories of ‘seeing to it that’, Belnap and Perloff (1988) and ‘bringing it about‘, Segerberg (1989), model the result of an action without regard to the original intention of the agent, so these logics are not of direct use to formalizing the re

烤架

BILK

Fiona Brady,Laurel Evelyn Dysonhat nonmonotonic reasoning can be characterized by Kripke structures whose beliefs are justified. We also observed that two different types of negative introspection in autoepistemic reasoning present two different interpretations of default negation: consistency-based and minimal-model-based; we fu

Peristalsis

忍受

Culturele antropologie en verpleegkunde,rn when those facts fall short. When confronted by a paradox such as the Nixon Diamond, or the Yale shooting problem, commonsense dictates that more information is required. We argue that while the concept of minimal knowledge is in some sense fundamental, adherence to it does not reflect the real w

基因組

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51586-1’ speech acts arc interpreted in terms of communicative intentions and expressed using mental states. These formalizations are too simplistic when considering real conversations. First, they consider that agents perform speech acts in a direct way and that an agent readily accepts other agents’ spee