Titlebook: Agent-Oriented Software Engineering VIII; 8th International Wo Michael Luck,Lin Padgham Book 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008 Pr

tic-douloureux

Germán Canale,Martina Fernández Fascioloodologies have not received much acceptance in industrial environments, which can be partially explained by drawbacks in current agent-oriented methodologies, mainly in terms of applicability and comprehensiveness. Specifically, Gaia, one of the most cited methodologies, does not consider agent desi

grovel

確保

Tao Xiong,Dezheng Feng,Guangwei Hureferences. Software engineering methodologies need to cope with the complexity of requirements specification in such scenarios, where new requirements may emerge also at run-time and the system’s goals are expected to evolve to meet new stakeholder needs..Following an agent-oriented approach, we ar

初學者

知道

acolyte

Maria Rosa Valluzzi,Luca Sbrogiòto manage interactions among agents and to improve infrastructures at runtime. We propose a framework for automatic processing of interactions generated using FIPA-ACL, a language widely accepted for agent platforms. This framework includes three elements: i) an agent interaction architecture to sys

V洗浴

Adjourn

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11422-0es (particularly BDI architectures) the deliberation process does not include any form of risk analysis. In this paper, we propose guidelines to implement Tropos Goal-Risk reasoning. Our proposal aims at introducing risk reasoning in the deliberation process of a BDI agent so that the overall set of

Canopy

Maria Rosa Valluzzi,Luca Sbrogiò change propagation is still a significant technical challenge in software engineering. In this paper we present an agent-oriented change propagation framework based on fixing inconsistencies when primary changes are made to design models. A core piece of the framework is a new method for generating

注意