Titlebook: Agent Communication; International Worksh Rogier M. Eijk,Marc-Philippe Huget,Frank Dignum Conference proceedings 2005 Springer-Verlag Berli

Biomarker

Lecture Notes in Computer Sciencehttp://image.papertrans.cn/a/image/151101.jpg

裂隙

煞費(fèi)苦心

Conversational Semantics with Social Commitmentsess of agents. To circumvent these limitations, several proposals have been put forth to define the semantics of messages using social commitments. We follow this trend and present a conversational model where the meaning of messages is based on their use as coordinating devices advancing conversati

neolith

A Semantic Approach for Designing Commitment Protocolsnts allow flexible execution of protocols and help agents reason about protocols and plan their actions accordingly, while at the same time providing a basis for compliance checking. Multiagent systems that employ commitment-based interaction can conveniently and effectively model business interacti

eucalyptus

A Scalable Petri Net Representation of Interaction Protocols for Overhearing important aspect of multi-agent applications. Lately, Petri nets have been found to provide certain advantages comparing to other representation approaches. Radically different approaches using Petri nets to represent multi-agent interactions have been proposed, and yet relative strengths and weakn

哀悼

peptic-ulcer

Optimal Communication Vocabularies and Heterogeneous Ontologiesnt is specialized in solving a particular task and therefore requires its own specialized ontology that is, in principle, not understandable for other agents. This heterogeneity of ontologies, of course, poses problems for the communication between agents. In our framework, we assume that the agents

不可思議

Dealing with Time in Content Language Expressionsdards like FIPA ACL do not outline a uniform way to specify such conditions in Content Language expressions. In this paper we extend a CTL*-like temporal language with two very expressive interval operators, and integrate it with a FIPA-compatible representation of dates. We then show, by a number o

dilute

Modeling Communicative Behavior Using Permissions and Obligations and obligations to describe both conversation specifications and policies. Conversation specifications are described in terms of the speech acts that an agent can/cannot/must/must not perform based on the sequence of messages received and sent. On the other hand, conversation policies restrict how

船員