Titlebook: Against Equality; Readings on Economic William Letwin (Professor of Political Science) Textbook 1983Latest edition Macmillan Publishers Lim

institute

Insulin

Equality of opportunity and equality of resultsuality, and have demonstrated a high level of technical skill in doing so. But the book misses the opportunity. To show how it comes to miss the opportunity, I must clarify at the outset certain points about inequalities in society. For it is the confusion between different meanings of inequality th

哭得清醒了

ingrate

Equality under the lawr than individualised or unpredictable fiat is to treat them in at least one respect equally. But this is not to say very much, since a rule which applies equally to all may make different provisions for some as against others. This, amongst other things, would make it difficult for a modern legisla

注射器

值得尊敬

The stability of inequalityhich are designed to reduce inequality. In the United States, for instance, there is a strong egalitarian bias, which de Tocqueville pointed out many years ago, in the political and social spirit of the society, but in spite of this the relative distribution both of income and of capital has exhibit

確認(rèn)

Equality and economic theory about the economic system has shifted dramatically from questions of efficiency and economic growth to questions of equity of income distribution and ‘the quality of life’. In the advanced industrial countries of ‘the West’, at least until the energy crisis and the beginnings of the current recessi

壁畫

The egalitarian imperative$300 billion. The primary support for transfer taxation derives from the belief that it is a valuable means of promoting equality in the distribution of wealth. Supporters of transfer taxation believe that the normal outcome of a market economy is increasing inequality in the ownership of wealth and

formula

耕種

The charity of the uncharitableer. There are, basically, two theories. The first is that those of us who are well-off use the state as a mechanism for making gifts to the poor. This is well represented by James Rodgers and Harold Hochman in their article, ‘Pareto Optimal Redistribution’.. The second view, which I shall call the ‘