找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: After Politics; The Rejection of Pol Glen Newey Book 2001 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2001 conflict.John

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 46553|回復(fù): 41
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 19:06:45 | 只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
期刊全稱After Politics
期刊簡稱The Rejection of Pol
影響因子2023Glen Newey
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/151/150937/150937.mp4
圖書封面Titlebook: After Politics; The Rejection of Pol Glen Newey Book 2001 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2001 conflict.John
影響因子Why do political philosophers why away from politics? After Politics: The Rejection of Politics in Contemporary Liberal Philosophy offers a challenging and original critique of liberalism, the dominant political philosophy of our time, tackling key issues like state legitimacy, value-pluralism, neutrality, the nature of politics, public reasons, and morality in politics. Analyzing major liberal theorists like Rawls, Habermas, Rorty, Barry, Gray, Raz, Larmore, Ackerman and others, Glen Newey argues that liberalism by-passes politics because it ignores or misunderstands human motivation, and elevates academic system-building over political realities of conflict and power.
Pindex Book 2001
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱After Politics影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱After Politics影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱After Politics網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱After Politics網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱After Politics被引頻次




書目名稱After Politics被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱After Politics年度引用




書目名稱After Politics年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱After Politics讀者反饋




書目名稱After Politics讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 21:35:18 | 只看該作者
Designing a New Hybrid Cryptographic Modelmansions, and definition is hazardous. But as a first approximation, it holds that.N: those political structures or outcomes alone are justifiable, which as far as possible remain impartial between competing interest-groups, holders of conceptions of the good, and so on, in civil society.
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 02:10:07 | 只看該作者
Xiaofeng Chen,Willy Susilo,Elisa BertinoWhat contribution can philosophy make to deciding what we have good reason politically to do? The question is not often posed as baldly as this, and when it is, there seems to be a number of possible answers.
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 07:56:46 | 只看該作者
Moral Theory and Political Philosophy,What contribution can philosophy make to deciding what we have good reason politically to do? The question is not often posed as baldly as this, and when it is, there seems to be a number of possible answers.
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 12:33:19 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 13:51:26 | 只看該作者
978-1-349-41776-6Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2001
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 17:40:36 | 只看該作者
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 21:39:26 | 只看該作者
Xiang Gao,Liuyun Lin,Tianying Lan,Xinyan Ganaffirmative was less startling than the fact that so notable a practitioner of the discipline thought it a question worth asking. Six years earlier, Peter Laslett had ruefully concluded that ‘political theory, at any rate for the time being, is dead’.. Few, if any, of those practising the discipline
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 05:11:51 | 只看該作者
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 07:22:42 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-11-1 17:18
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
会东县| 拉萨市| 波密县| 镶黄旗| 台江县| 镇原县| 昆山市| 武冈市| 视频| 宁强县| 瑞丽市| 三穗县| 鄢陵县| 赤峰市| 和静县| 鹰潭市| 宕昌县| 宁津县| 南投县| 东乡县| 清水县| 海门市| 大余县| 贵南县| 晋宁县| 齐齐哈尔市| 剑川县| 英超| 临泉县| 宜君县| 溧阳市| 兴安盟| 清徐县| 正阳县| 尼木县| 田阳县| 康马县| 三台县| 油尖旺区| 龙南县| 龙泉市|