Titlebook: After Fordism; Robert Boyer,Jean-Pierre Durand Book 1997 Robert Boyer and Jean-Pierre Durand 1997 crisis.production.transformation.transit

ARM

PACT

故意

disrupt

領(lǐng)袖氣質(zhì)

https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52688-5roduction could never be more than a deepening of the scientific organisation of work, the equivalent of the transition from Ford’s model ‘T’ to the annual model change instigated by General Motors (see Figure 6.1). This diagnosis of great continuity is reinforced in countries where nostalgia for Fo

高興一回

Danny O’Rourke-Dicarlo,James Sheptyckisumption. It could be even better described as an upward spiral of capitalist accumulation supported by the welfare state, strong labour unionism and credit-based consumerism, each of which played its part in the virtuous circle linking production to consumption.. Two fundamental technologies underl

出處

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8921-2. This hypothesis deserves further discussion. The issue is the cause of the increase in product variety that has occurred over the last two decades. Is this due to a change in consumer behaviour based on social class differentiation and the rise of individualism? Or is increased product variety due

潔凈

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8921-2have shown that while they are partially successful, social forces or socio-organisational constraints can restrict the coherence of the overarching principles. In this chapter we pursue this question further, to investigate the real structural depth of such changes (including their associated techn

指數(shù)

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8921-2nce of new forms of production. To be sure, any attempt to escape from crisis creates new solutions to old problems, and can thus even displace or modify old issues. But is that sufficient grounds for believing the old order or old forms of organisation to have ruptured? To talk of rupture, we would

exacerbate