Titlebook: Affectivity and Philosophy after Spinoza and Nietzsche; Making Knowledge the Stuart Pethick Book 2015 Stuart Pethick 2015 Spinoza.Nietzsche

Intrepid

致命

Concrete CSR Measures: What can a Firm do?,noza accepts it as the essential way in which we live and therefore something to be affirmed and appreciated: ., the constant sense of transience and ‘inbetween-ness’ that relates each and every discernible experience of the world, is precisely that which allows us to build a knowledge that can comp

革新

出處

Concrete CSR Measures: What can a Firm do?,eeling of . outlined in the previous two chapters to that of .; that is, the conscious awareness of life’s finitude and the foreboding sense that all of life’s efforts are ultimately ‘in vain’. Plato is targeted in particular here as exacerbating the inherent nihilism of consciousness by attempting

災(zāi)難

Michael S. Aβl?nder,Markus Schenkel of philosophy as a search for knowledge that can provide ultimate answers as to what is good, evil, right or wrong is thus dispensed with, for these are ultimately . that bear witness to certain affective relations, and it is this that is important for philosophy.

增減字母法

獨(dú)輪車

Slit-Lamp

Introduction,political form of organisation, whereas Nietzsche’s elliptical aphorisms seem to favour the aristocratic ‘pathos of distance’. They were furthermore separated by two centuries and came from very different backgrounds: seventeenth century Spinoza, a lens-grinder and the descendent of a Sephardic Jewi

organism

Spinoza: Discovering What the Body Can Do,noza accepts it as the essential way in which we live and therefore something to be affirmed and appreciated: ., the constant sense of transience and ‘inbetween-ness’ that relates each and every discernible experience of the world, is precisely that which allows us to build a knowledge that can comp

向外

Nietzsche and the Sign Language of the Affects,d early works, such as The Birth of Tragedy, as well as the more ‘positivist’ stance of . to a more ‘Spinozist’ orientation towards the immanence of affectivity. In fact, although Nietzsche uses the term . (spelt with a ‘c’) occasionally before his discovery of Spinoza during 1881, this is dropped a