Titlebook: Affective Equality; Love, Care and Injus Kathleen Lynch,John Baker,Maeve O’Brien Book 2009 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publ

Nmda-Receptor

Corporate Real Estate Managementnerable. This understanding of care portrays it as a deeply asymmetrical relationship and leads us to expect marked power inequalities within it, with the caregiver exercising power over care recipients.

Consensus

急性

Gender, Social Class and Lone Caring: The Intersectionality of Inequalities,stems. While the gender inequalities in the doing of care work are well recognised in the research literature (Lewis, 1998), there is a need to explore how other differences in social class and family status intersect with gender and determine the conditions of caring.

zonules

Love Labouring: Power and Mutuality,nerable. This understanding of care portrays it as a deeply asymmetrical relationship and leads us to expect marked power inequalities within it, with the caregiver exercising power over care recipients.

COWER

Perennial長期的

Ornament

CANON

Conclusion,nd recognition, (2) resources, (3) love, care and solidarity, (4) power, and (5) working and learning. The material in this book demonstrates quite clearly the multidimensional character of inequality within the affective system, and the ways in which inequalities in the economic, political and cultural systems impact on the affective sphere.

新娘

老巫婆

,Living in Care and Without Love — The Impact of Affective Inequalities on Learning Literacy,cess and findings of a three-year ethnographic study carried out with survivors of institutional abuse in Irish industrial schools. In particular, the perspective moves from the teacher or parent as caregiver to the learner as a care recipient in a learning relationship.