Titlebook: Aesthetic Realism; Inês Morais Book 2019 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switz

有判斷力

書目名稱Aesthetic Realism影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Aesthetic Realism影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Aesthetic Realism網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Aesthetic Realism網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Aesthetic Realism被引頻次




書目名稱Aesthetic Realism被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Aesthetic Realism年度引用




書目名稱Aesthetic Realism年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Aesthetic Realism讀者反饋




書目名稱Aesthetic Realism讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

BYRE

Error Theory,se moral (and generally evaluative) thought and discourse. The sceptic claims that the mistake calls for correction, by means of an ‘error theory’. My reply is that common-sense is . committed to the sort of objectivist view correctly seen by the error-theorist as implausible. Therefore, I claim, th

Capitulate

conservative

Excise

Arguments for Aesthetic Realism,itive defence of realism is based on explanatory considerations. Aesthetic realism is defended via an inference to the best explanation of the normativity of aesthetic discourse. In particular, the patent limitations of the applicability of aesthetic terms (including the most general aesthetic terms

upstart

預(yù)知

Book 2019literature).? Morais lucidly argues that art criticism, when referring to aesthetic properties, is referring not ultimately to the critic’s subjective reactions, but to genuine properties of the works. With a focus on contemporary discussion conducted in the analytic tradition, as well as on argumen

凹處

The Nature of Aesthetic Reality,rties (Beardsley), as higher-order ways of appearing (Levinson), and as desire-mediated properties (Zemach). I explain why, contrary to claims by Levinson and Moore, beauty should be included among the aesthetic properties.

珊瑚

Conclusion and Recommendations, general sentimentalism which is an . doctrine concerning how (aesthetic) truths are known. My claim is that Hume’s epistemology of beauty leaves room for, and perhaps lends support to, a moderate aesthetic realism.

委托

Book 2019ogical debate about aesthetic realism, Morais discusses two powerful attacks on aesthetic realism before defending the doctrine against them and providing a positive realist account of aesthetic properties..