Titlebook: Adverbial Modification; Interval Semantics a M. J. Cresswell Book 1985 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland 1985 adverbial.even

議程

瑪瑙

Adverbial Modification in Situation Semantics,l base my discussion on the account developed in their book . [3], and, unless otherwise indicated, any reference to situation semantics will be from that work. Further developments are promised of course but I hope that what I say will be addressed to fundamental questions which will not be seriously affected by later refinements to the theory.

Expostulate

Introduction, β do not mean the same [10, p. 69]. It is perhaps more a slogan than a principle, and, like all slogans, requires explanation and qualification. Nevertheless, it still does seem to me the most certain thing I know about meaning, and any adequate semantic theory must, in my view, give content to thi

捕鯨魚叉

Adverbs and Events, and treat them as sentential operators of the same syntactical category as ... The other is to follow Donald Davidson. and represent them in the predicate calculus with the aid of an extra argument place in the verb to be modified. Montague’s approach requires an intensional language and so there s

向下

Adverbs of Space and Time, and prepositional modification. It very soon became apparent to me that the role of space and time in adverbial modification was far greater than I, in company with most logicians, had ever assumed. It also became clear that a great many general puzzles about modification could be looked at using s

BINGE

conservative

Prepositions and Points of View, particularly such words as . and others, all of which seem to depend for their meaning on looking at things from a certain point of view. Charles Fillmore [17] has recently shown how pervasive the use of points of view is in discourse. Indeed his work makes the task of formalizing it look well-nigh

儲(chǔ)備

Gum-Disease

Adverbs of Causation,s.. It should be obvious, however, that even if one’s aim is the construction of a general framework for semantic theory, such a framework can only be justified if it can be applied to actual sentences of natural language; and that means to actual words of natural language. In some cases it is unnec

Headstrong

Adverbial Modification in Situation Semantics,l base my discussion on the account developed in their book . [3], and, unless otherwise indicated, any reference to situation semantics will be from that work. Further developments are promised of course but I hope that what I say will be addressed to fundamental questions which will not be serious