Titlebook: Advancing Information Systems Theories; Rationale and Proces Nik Rushdi Hassan,Leslie P. Willcocks Book 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable)

問(wèn)到了燒瓶

Selected Properties of Controlled Processes, are seen as dialectically related phenomena—one cannot be understood without the others. The practical relevance of the approach is demonstrated by the communalization of an IT artifact in the telecom industry. We discuss how mainstream IS research areas such as communication, sociomateriality, dig

buoyant

Book 2021ies...The first step in reaching the goal of developing native IS theories is to reachan agreement on the need for theory (its rationale) and its role as the most distinctive product of human intellectual activity. This volume addresses what theories are, why bother with theories and the process of

Liberate

Modicum

Advancing Information Systems Theories978-3-030-64884-8Series ISSN 2730-6623 Series E-ISSN 2730-6631

知識(shí)

圓錐

Technology, Work and Globalizationhttp://image.papertrans.cn/a/image/150356.jpg

rods366

支形吊燈

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4346-9discussing research outcomes both when crafting and when evaluating manuscripts for publication. By taking an incremental view of knowledge development, we identify three types of research contributions: theoretical, empirical, and artefactual. Because an implication always exists in relation to a c

機(jī)警

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4346-9tology, Causal Trajectory, and Causal Autonomy. The focus of the Causal Ontology dimension is: Does the theorist conceive of causality as existing in the human mind or in reality? The concern of the Causal Trajectory dimension is: How does the theorist conceive the “social space” related to technolo

Proponent

Stochastic Control of Dynamical Systemsey also often hold a romantic view of theory building, which they envision either as emerging from trancelike writing or as the product of a straightforward deductive process. The perspective I offer is more realistic and pragmatic. I espouse the view that the outcomes of a researcher’s theorizing e