Titlebook: Ad-Hoc, Mobile, and Wireless Networks; Second International Samuel Pierre,Michel Barbeau,Evangelos Kranakis Conference proceedings 2003 Spr

jettison

Lecture Notes in Computer Sciencehttp://image.papertrans.cn/a/image/144461.jpg

BILK

https://doi.org/10.1007/b14230QoS; Routing; WLAN; ad-hoc networking; ad-hoc networks; complexity; configuration; cooperating nodes; mobile

不易燃

epidermis

Ad-Hoc, Mobile, and Wireless Networks978-3-540-39611-6Series ISSN 0302-9743 Series E-ISSN 1611-3349

addition

0302-9743 Overview: Includes supplementary material: 978-3-540-20260-8978-3-540-39611-6Series ISSN 0302-9743 Series E-ISSN 1611-3349

intricacy

Sabine Lamprecht,Hans Lamprechtorithms offer a better performance based on the call- to-mobility ratio (CMR) and require less time for the location update and the tunneling compared with the Mobile IP model. These results are very useful and interesting for a real-time context where the factor time is very important.

DAFT

Commodious

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-68832-8ing protocols. Then we set a new signal power threshold during the route discovery process so that only those links with strong enough signal power will be chosen; we also reduce some control messages for DSR. The simulation results show significant increases in packet delivery ratio and decreases in packet latency for both protocols.

推崇

Amerikastudien / American Studies (Amst)tocol. The goal is to achieve an implementation independent, scalable comparison methodology for protocols. In this paper we evaluate the DSR and AODV routing protocols in the MERIT tool. Our results agree with performance studies comparing these two protocols, validating the MERIT methodology.

Angiogenesis

María Cendán Castillo,Isabel Novo Cortierhead generated by the proactive QoS routing have a negative impact on the performance of the routing protocol. Given the negative results, we identified research areas that would be worthwhile investigating in order to obtain better performance results.