Titlebook: Accountability and Regulatory Governance; Audiences, Controls Andrea C. Bianculli (Research Fellow),Xavier Ferná Book 2015 Palgrave Macmil

欺騙世家

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-39785-2nsfer to them regulatory powers in many policy areas (Jordana et al. 2011), thus contributing to changes in the interaction between the public and private domains (Bernstain 1955; Majone 1994; Giraudi and Righettini 2001; Gilardi 2008). The expression ‘the rise of the regulatory state’ refers to a d

做作

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-39785-2ry states remain scarce. Extant literature on the independent regulatory agencies (IRAs) highlights the concerns of democratic legitimacy raised by the independence of these agencies (Majone 1999). In emerging countries, such concerns are accentuated because of the major role played by the internati

高歌

逗它小傻瓜

噴出

Cholecystokinin

defray

Book 2015This collection improves our understanding of the problems associated to accountability in regulatory governance, focusing on audiences, controls and responsibilities in the politics of regulation and through a systematic exploration of the various mechanisms through which accountability in regulatory governance

小蟲

https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137349583capitalism; democracy; European Union (EU); governance; Policy; politics; sovereignty

tympanometry

Analogy

J. M. Lee,G. W. Jones,June Burnhamountability-related debates need to consider what public services actually seek to achieve rather than regard accountability as an end in itself. Furthermore, it explores the (limited) extent to which European telecommunications and energy regulators have sought to advance consumer sovereignty through a ‘web census’.