| 期刊全稱 | Academic Skepticism in Hume and Kant | | 期刊簡(jiǎn)稱 | A Ciceronian Critiqu | | 影響因子2023 | Catalina González Quintero | | 視頻video | http://file.papertrans.cn/144/143592/143592.mp4 | | 發(fā)行地址 | The first and only book to discuss the influence of academic skepticism on Kant.Only book dealing in depth with Hume’s relation to Academic skepticism.Develops in unprecedented ways the contemporary d | | 學(xué)科分類 | Synthese Library | | 圖書封面 |  | | 影響因子 | .This book offers an unprecedented study of the influence of the skepticism of the New Platonic Academy on David Hume’s and Immanuel Kant’s critiques of metaphysics. By demonstrating how the skeptical teachings of the Academy affected these authors’ Enlightened attacks on traditional metaphysics, this book deepens and broadens the burgeoning scholarship on the role that the Ancients schools of skepticism played in the configuration of Modern skeptical outlooks. It bolsters the newfound recognition that we must reconsider the conventional view that the revival of Pyrrhonism in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries gave birth to Modern skepticism by incorporating the influence of Academic skepticism in the analysis..Giving a new impetus to this line of research, the author argues that Academic ideas and methods informed Hume’s and Kant’s critique of metaphysics in substantial and thus far unacknowledged ways. Specifically, she demonstrates the centrality of Academic skepticismto Hume’s epistemology and critique of religion through a detailed analysis of his theory of belief in the?.Treatise.?and the first?.Enquiry.?as well as of its?.application in the?.Dialogues concerning Natural | | Pindex | Book 2022 |
The information of publication is updating
|
|
|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋|
派博傳思國(guó)際
( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328)
GMT+8, 2025-10-15 02:37
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 20:05:39
