Titlebook: A. E. Housman; A Critical Biography Norman Page Book 1996 Norman Page 1996 biography.comic.drawing.English.English language.humour.knowledg

只有

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87903-7the circumstances of his failure, must have been increased by feelings of guilt and intensified by his proud and lonely refusal to find solace in human relationships. Fifty-five years later his sister Kate still remembered his mood during this period as ‘very morose... I saw little of him except at

仇恨

觀察

飛來(lái)飛去真休

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87903-7cludes a dead man, his subject, and can hardly escape the sense of a ghost, gratified or resentful, at his elbow. Housman would not have applauded very loudly the attempt to write his biography, but I think he would have viewed it more tolerantly than is often supposed. He was a man of deep reserve

沖突

交響樂(lè)

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87903-7ital of romance’.* (Wilde’s final year was Housman’s first; there seems to have been no contact between the flamboyant Irishman at Magdalen and the quiet boy at St John’s, but twenty years later Housman sent Wilde a copy of . after his release from Reading Gaol.) Father Gerard Manley Hopkins, on the

coalition

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87903-7rn of comings and goings, objectives and challenges, and had placed at his disposal a small but important circle of friendships in a society in which roles were clearly defined and considerable individual freedom existed within a framework of institutional authority and discipline. When he returned

易怒

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87903-7less there was something inevitable about it: given his strength of will and powers of self-discipline, the years of penance seem in retrospect no more than an interruption of his real vocation, though there must have been hours and weeks when it was hard for him to believe that he would not grow ol

panorama

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87903-7rs, he had never ‘identified himself’ with University College ‘in a way which would have made it difficult for him to leave it’;* Chambers may also be saying between the lines that Housman’s evident ambition was not likely to let him remain in Gower Street for ever. In a note of thanks for congratul

parasite