Titlebook: A Sustainable Philosophy—The Work of Bryan Norton; Sahotra Sarkar,Ben A. Minteer Book 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of S

fluoroscopy

接合

中世紀(jì)

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-26704-2 I show that aspects of Callicott’s interpretation of Leopold do not exclude a pragmatist reading, and argue that Callicott has misunderstood Jamesian pragmatism in ways that undermine his case. Finally, I suggest that Jamesian pragmatic naturalism has far more radical potential than Callicott allow

拘留

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-26704-2 so universalizes very specific and idiosyncratic sentiments. Pragmatism offers escape from this trap by insisting that all choice is informed by reasons, and sapient adults are in need of reasonable reasons. Being told that an observed object is intrinsically valuable is not a reason. Its only purp

說不出

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-91963-3ons of Norton’s proceduralist approach through a case study in community-based forest management in a New York State urban old-growth park. I argue that Norton’s procedural priorities are too rigid given the contextual constraints of local decision-making. While they are useful for guiding an ideal,

進(jìn)步

fructose

SPURN

Anleitung zur Berechnung einer Dampfmaschinehapter, we explore some of this recent empirical work examining?zoo visitors’ experiences and argue that Norton’s early writing in environmental ethics and conservation, particularly his notion of “transformative value,” offers a philosophical grounding for understanding the ethical potential of enc