Titlebook: A Critical Introduction to the Poems of Thomas Hardy; Trevor Johnson Textbook 1991Latest edition Macmillan Publishers Limited 1991 history

生存環(huán)境

The Rationale for Agent-Based Modelingoduction to his verse for those — conscripts and volunteers alike — who are approaching it for the first time, probably by way of a selection from his large and diverse output. I believe that Hardy would have approved my intention at least, since he made it a condition of his Will that his . should

讓空氣進入

Toshiyuki Kaneda,Yasuhisa Hattorilley, for example, the first poet to win his devotion, and Browning, whom he knew personally and admired, both cut much more exciting capers on the stage of the nineteenth century than he did. Naturally this need not imply that his biography is devoid of interest, but his extended double career—star

occurrence

CHAR

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67050-8the manifestly fictitious narratives, anecdotes and ballads, virtually all of Hardy’s poems tell us . of his intellectual, spiritual or emotional pilgrimage through life. But a narrower definition of autobiography is needed to make this section manageable and, since the love poetry has a chapter to

手榴彈

策略

Martin Schaefer,Michal ?áp,Ji?í Vok?ínek novel, he had certainly given his readers a good few ‘ideas’ to hate: sexual incompatibility, the ‘new woman’, child suicide, Oxbridge arrogance, and religious hysteria among them. In this sense then he cannot be said to have ‘hated ideas’ himself; indeed, so far from being an ivory-tower-dwelling

Suggestions

出沒

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46331-5ut their courtship and marriage; 20 or so more may, with reasonable certitude, be ascribed to the same creative origin. Of all this passionate outpouring Emma herself — and it is a truly terrible irony — can have seen scarcely a trace. Only four poems, two certainly and two very probably about her,

夸張

開花期女

Martin Schaefer,Michal ?áp,Ji?í Vok?ínekview with William Archer he asked, ‘What are my books but one long plea against ‘man’s inhumanity to man’ — to woman — and to the lower animals?’ adding that he hoped, ‘[All] mankind may be, and one day will be, viewed as members of one corporeal frame.’