Titlebook: A Changing United Nations; Multilateral Evoluti W. Andy Knight Book 2000 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 200

雕鏤

S. S. Varre,Muhammad Aurangzeb,Mais Nijimons and global governance institutions is emerging. The analysis of international organization is undergoing a fundamental shift from traditional to more critical approaches that try to map the trajectory of multilateral evolution and the quest for global governance.

Osmosis

2947-8863 ong-term adaptation agenda (and strategy) that would allow it to be a relevant institution of global governance for the twenty-first century. Reform and reflexive institutional adjustments have failed to address underlying problems facing this organization. After fifty-five years of existence it is

ESPY

Beatrice M. Cerda,Shengli Yuan,Lei Chenntral role in global governance by responding to changing international conditions and new societal demands. It has done so through a process of cybernetic learning or reflexive adaptation. This chapter is concerned with the extent to which reflexive adaptation has occurred in the UN.

Consequence

https://doi.org/10.1057/9780333984420evolution; global governance; Governance; Institution; Nation; organization; United Nations

Exclude

d-limonene

Global Issueshttp://image.papertrans.cn/a/image/140175.jpg

進(jìn)入

S. S. Varre,Muhammad Aurangzeb,Mais NijimBy the late 1930s the League of Nations was in obvious trouble. It was unable to adjust to the pressures for change coming from the international system. It also did not keep pace with broader multilateral developments. The League folded as the Second World War erupted.

tic-douloureux

GLOOM

S. S. Varre,Muhammad Aurangzeb,Mais Nijimsidered ‘critical’ or reflective. Indeed, most UN studies tend to treat the world body as a given and reflect a rationalist treatment of international institutions.. However, as the UN’s underlying purpose is increasingly questioned, a growing body of reflectivist research on multilateral organizati

Eructation

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71017-0se authors convincingly argue that ‘not only is dealing with change the ultimate benchmark of effectiveness but a suitable approach to change would constitute, in itself, the most promising basis for a general approach to international relations’.. Such a position is embraced in this book and applie