Titlebook: Word Formation in Parallel Architecture; The Case for a Separ Pius ten Hacken Book 2019 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer

CLAMP

The Word Formation Component in PA,kendoff’s original model. The process nature of word formation is accounted for in a way compatible with Anderson’s A-Morphous Morphology. The naming function of word formation is highlighted in a way similar to ?tekauer’s onomasiological approach to word formation.

學術(shù)討論會

Introduction,ation rules are rules for combining morphemes into words. In the European tradition, word formation rules are rules for producing new words as names for new concepts. These two perspectives are not necessarily in conflict with each other, but they put an emphasis on different aspects of word formation.

Meander

CRAB

軟弱

Nausea

LEERY

The Boundaries of Word Formation,ed to lexical entries, word formation rules specify the input and the output. Each of the three representations of PA can independently be changed or not. Only when the conceptual structure is changed, does a process qualify as a possible word formation rule. This excludes pure transposition (change

atopic-rhinitis

The Word Formation Component in PA,hereas the lexicon consists of entries (words and rules) that are used to form expressions in performance, word formation is a component that produces new lexical entries as elements of competence. This model can account for the observations in Chaps. ., . and . in a way that is not available in Jac

改正

Book 2019g. It shows that there are good reasons to single out word formation as a separate component in PA. It demonstrates that it is a drawback not to distinguish word formation, and explains that the function of word formation rules is different from the function of the lexicon and rules of grammar. Afte

優(yōu)雅