Titlebook: Why Democracies Flounder and Fail; Remedying Mass Socie Michael Haas Book 2019 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2019 Democra

只看該作者 · 發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 09:18:07

Book 2019cerned with corporate interests and have developed oligarchical mindsets. Rather than micro-remedy bandaids, the author focuses on the need to transform governing philosophies from pragmatic to humanistic solutions.?.

只看該作者 · 發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 12:00:28

只看該作者 · 發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 16:38:41

只看該作者 · 發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 20:32:20

只看該作者 · 發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 02:03:43

只看該作者 · 發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 05:58:41

只看該作者 · 發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 11:43:43

Immobilism in the French Fourth Republicblic that parliamentarians were unable to achieve productive or?stable governments. The resulting immobilism prompted a coup, which led to a new constitution to give more power to the executive president.?There are many parallels with the immobilism of the current?American political system, as described in detail within?Chap. ..

只看該作者 · 發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 14:35:44

Global Mass Society normal democratic functioning almost impossible. Global gridlock has resulted from the same issues that plague democracies today. Although transnational civil society has tried to achieve a degree of democratic global governance, the result mostly has been to reinforce the global power structure.

只看該作者 · 發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 17:22:10

		自動(dòng)登錄	找回密碼
密碼			To register

關(guān)于派博傳思			派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站			友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹	公司地理位置	論文服務(wù)流程	影響因子官網(wǎng)	吾愛(ài)論文網(wǎng)	大講堂	北京大學(xué)	Oxford Uni.	Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革	期刊點(diǎn)評(píng)	投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié)	SCIENCEGARD	IMPACTFACTOR	派博系數(shù)	清華大學(xué)	Yale Uni.	Stanford Uni.
\|Archiver\|手機(jī)版\|小黑屋\| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2026-1-19 02:22
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved