找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Why Criminalize?; New Perspectives on Thomas S?birk Petersen Book 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020 Principles of criminalization.W

[復制鏈接]
查看: 41723|回復: 37
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 16:17:19 | 只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Why Criminalize?
副標題New Perspectives on
編輯Thomas S?birk Petersen
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/1029/1028118/1028118.mp4
概述Offers a brand new criticism of well-known and central principles of criminalization.Delivers the first modern (since the days of Bentham and Mill) defense of a utilitarian principle of criminalizatio
叢書名稱Law and Philosophy Library
圖書封面Titlebook: Why Criminalize?; New Perspectives on  Thomas S?birk Petersen Book 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020 Principles of criminalization.W
描述The book defines and critically discusses the following five principles: the harm principle, legal paternalism, the offense principle, legal moralism and the dignity principle of criminalization. The book argues that all five principles raise important problems that point to rejections (or at least a rethink) of standard principles of criminalization.. .The book shows that one of the reasons why we should reject or revise standard principles of criminalization is that even the most plausible versions of the harm principle and legal paternalism that have been offered so far are rendered redundant by general moral theories. Furthermore, it demonstrates that the other three principles (or versions thereof), the offense principle, legal moralism and the dignity principle of criminalization, can either be covered by the harm principle, thus making these principles also redundant, or be seen to have what look like other unacceptable implications (e.g. that versions of legal moralism are based on speculative and incorrect empirical assumptions or?violate what is called the criminological levelling-down challenge). As such, there is reason to move beyond traditional principles of criminali
出版日期Book 2020
關鍵詞Principles of criminalization; What to criminalize; Legal moralism; The harm principle; Utilitarianism a
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34690-4
isbn_softcover978-3-030-34692-8
isbn_ebook978-3-030-34690-4Series ISSN 1572-4395 Series E-ISSN 2215-0315
issn_series 1572-4395
copyrightSpringer Nature Switzerland AG 2020
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Why Criminalize?影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Why Criminalize?影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Why Criminalize?網絡公開度




書目名稱Why Criminalize?網絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱Why Criminalize?被引頻次




書目名稱Why Criminalize?被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Why Criminalize?年度引用




書目名稱Why Criminalize?年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Why Criminalize?讀者反饋




書目名稱Why Criminalize?讀者反饋學科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 22:37:01 | 只看該作者
Harm and Criminalization: On Why Harm Principles Are Redundant,better understanding of when an individual is being harmed by another individual than the other baselines discussed, even though it has problematic implications of its own. The counterfactual baseline says, roughly, that a person P1 is harmed by another person P2 doing C, if and only if P1’s well-be
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 02:19:15 | 只看該作者
No Offense! On the Offense Principle and Some New Challenges,n of harm, deployed by leading proponents of the offense principle such as Feinberg, A. P. Simester and Andreas von Hirsch, as a ‘setback to interests’ is both difficult to apply to the distinction between harming and causing offence and in itself inadequately supported.
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 07:06:23 | 只看該作者
New Legal Moralism: Some Strengths and Challenges,he main argument for this thesis is that, in its more modern versions, legal moralism is immune to some of the powerful challenges to Devlin made by Hart, Dworkin and Feinberg, among others. As an example of this, it is shown that, while it follows from Devlin’s position that the state should enforc
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 10:02:58 | 只看該作者
Book 2020o have what look like other unacceptable implications (e.g. that versions of legal moralism are based on speculative and incorrect empirical assumptions or?violate what is called the criminological levelling-down challenge). As such, there is reason to move beyond traditional principles of criminali
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 16:04:02 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 19:31:04 | 只看該作者
Thomas S?birk Petersenxamined by that laboratory. Quality assurance (QA) for such a laboratory includes all of the activities associated with insuring that chemical and physical measurements are made properly, interpreted correctly and reported with appropriate estimates of error and confidence levels. QA activities also
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 01:00:21 | 只看該作者
Thomas S?birk Petersen community analysis of in situ benthic macroinvertebrates (Hudson and Ciborowksi, 1995) and plants (Lovett Doust et al., 1994; Tracy et al., 1995; Sgro and Johansen, 1995), and in sentinel biomonitor studies (Rosenberg and Resh, 1993; Corkum et al., 1995). These studies indicate the enormity of the
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 02:49:16 | 只看該作者
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 09:28:46 | 只看該作者
n the 1980s and 1990s, based on mcotine and strobilurin, major inventions were made in bringing to the market compounds, such as Bayer’s (Germany) imidacloprid (.) and ICI (UK) A5504 (azoxystrobm) (.), shown in .. In addition, BASF also has invented a strobilurin analog called kresoxlme methyl (BAS4
 關于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網 吾愛論文網 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經驗總結 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2026-1-20 17:47
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網安備110108008328 版權所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
武胜县| 曲水县| 乐平市| 吴桥县| 绥芬河市| 东安县| 西乌珠穆沁旗| 自治县| 久治县| 民丰县| 西安市| 五莲县| 红桥区| 海阳市| 晋州市| 高安市| 两当县| 德兴市| 肃北| 嵊泗县| 美姑县| 怀远县| 睢宁县| 张掖市| 沁源县| 丰都县| 集贤县| 凤凰县| 靖远县| 牡丹江市| 平阴县| 营口市| 霍邱县| 中江县| 神木县| 江城| 西乌珠穆沁旗| 莱芜市| 攀枝花市| 呼和浩特市| 秦皇岛市|