Titlebook: Who Saved Antarctica?; The Heroic Era of An Andrew Jackson Book 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive licen

鞠躬

,Tensions over Antarctica’s Future: October 1989 to November 1990,mining be prohibited. This was to be sought through a comprehensive environmental protection regime which Australia argued should be a convention. Other states defended the minerals regime, but also accepted that environmental obligations could be consolidated in a protocol to the Treaty. The attitu

Hectic

Negotiating an Environment Protocol: November 1990 to April 1991,g in Antarctica. One test of the latter would be whether Parties would proceed with liability rules for the minerals convention. Discussing these rules was abandoned when it became clear that there was insufficient support for the Antarctic minerals convention. Several options for environmental regu

MAIZE

Antarctic Consensus Restored: April to October 1991,on the content of a protocol which included a mining ban and principles for all Antarctic activities. Detailed rules on environmental impact assessment, protection of flora and fauna, waste management and prevention of marine pollution were also drafted. The content and scope of the regime was large

Rejuvenate

Influences and Influencers in Antarctic Affairs,d influences affected the events. Both had to work to achieve the shift from a convention to regulate Antarctic mineral resource activities, to an environmental protocol that prohibited them. It explains how pre-existing circumstances, coincidences and serendipitous events propelled change and overc

PACK

極微小

清醒

法律的瑕疵

Introduction,ernment can provide insight into the conduct of Antarctic diplomacy and the inner workings of the Antarctic Treaty System’s search for consensus. It shows the potential and limits of diplomatic history, and introduces the analytical tools which can be used to make sense of what occurred.

Complement

Inferior