Titlebook: Whitehead’s Philosophy of Organism; Dorothy Emmet Book 1966Latest edition Dorothy Emmet 1966 modern philosophy.philosophy.social philosoph

Lineage

,Whitehead’s Defence of Rationalism,lutions of the Christian world, the revolutions of religion, and with them the civil, social and domestic habits of the nations concerned, have coincided with the rise and fall of metaphysical systems.—C..

顯示

,Some Challenges to “The Sentiment of Rationality”,his talk about the Speculative Reason; this assertion that there is still a place for pure metaphysics, with its ideal of a rational scheme? Has Whitehead fairly faced the problem set by the Critical Philosophy, the question as to whether the necessary logical laws of our reason are also the laws of

Colonoscopy

Are the Eternal Objects Platonic Ideas?,a strong suspicion that the best general description that may be given of his philosophy is to say that it is a modern form of Platonism. Whitehead himself owns and welcomes this analogy,. but this suggestion of a possible way of interpreting him has not, so far as I am aware, been very much taken u

FILTH

言外之意

Creativity and Order,ngs composite are, in so far as they are: for things uncompounded are in themselves, because they are one ; but things compounded imitate unity by the harmony of their parts, and so far as they attain to unity, they are. Wherefore order and rule secure being, disorder tends to not-being.— ST. A..

寄生蟲

Final Applications of the Philosophy of Organism in Natural Theology,s ; that scientific materialism need no longer be taken seriously as a metaphysic, however necessary it may be to the scientific worker as an . attitude towards the abstracted aspects of the world he is studying through his scientific method. Yet in view of the baffling complexity of the subject-mat

漂浮

Conclusion,his book is not intended to be an epitome of Whitehead’S great work. It is, as I said at the outset, of the nature of an acknowledgment of the interest which a student has found in it; and an interpretation which is necessarily made from the humanist and not from the scientific point of view. In the

hermitage

curriculum

禁止