找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開(kāi)始

掃一掃,訪問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Which Babies Shall Live?; Humanistic Dimension Thomas H. Murray,Arthur L. Caplan Book 1985 The Humana Press Inc. 1985 autonomy.care.cast.ch

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 42939|回復(fù): 52
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 19:14:43 | 只看該作者 |倒序?yàn)g覽 |閱讀模式
書(shū)目名稱Which Babies Shall Live?
副標(biāo)題Humanistic Dimension
編輯Thomas H. Murray,Arthur L. Caplan
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/1028/1027937/1027937.mp4
叢書(shū)名稱Contemporary Issues in Biomedicine, Ethics, and Society
圖書(shū)封面Titlebook: Which Babies Shall Live?; Humanistic Dimension Thomas H. Murray,Arthur L. Caplan Book 1985 The Humana Press Inc. 1985 autonomy.care.cast.ch
描述The fate of seriously ill newborns has captured the atten- tion of the public, of national and state legislators, and of powerful interest groups. For the most part, the debate has been cast in the narrowest possible terms: "discrimination against the handicapped"; "physician authority"; "family autonomy." We believe that something much more profound is happening: the debate over the care of sick and dying babies appears to be both a manifestation of great changes in our feelings about infants, children, and families, and a reflection of deep and abiding attitudes toward the newborn, the handi- capped, and perhaps other humans who are "less than" nor- mal, rational adults. How could we cast some light on those feelings and attitudes that seemed to determine silently the course of the public debate? We chose to enlist the humanities-the dis- players and critics of our cultural forms. Rather than closing down the public discussion, we wanted to open it up, to illuminate it with the light of history, religion, philosophy, literature, jurisprudence, and humanistically oriented sociol- ogy. This book is a first effort to place the hotly contested Baby Doe debate into a broader cultural
出版日期Book 1985
關(guān)鍵詞autonomy; care; cast; child; children; evolution; fat; feeling; intensive care; medicine; morality; newborn; phi
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5000-5
isbn_softcover978-1-4612-9392-7
isbn_ebook978-1-4612-5000-5
copyrightThe Humana Press Inc. 1985
The information of publication is updating

書(shū)目名稱Which Babies Shall Live?影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱Which Babies Shall Live?影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Which Babies Shall Live?網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱Which Babies Shall Live?網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Which Babies Shall Live?被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱Which Babies Shall Live?被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Which Babies Shall Live?年度引用




書(shū)目名稱Which Babies Shall Live?年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Which Babies Shall Live?讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱Which Babies Shall Live?讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒(méi)有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 21:22:19 | 只看該作者
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 01:32:24 | 只看該作者
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 06:32:04 | 只看該作者
Response to “Science and Controversy in the History of Infancy in America”on of what parents do to their children, or how they raise them, think of them, or feel about them. Professor Kett’s opening, cautionary remark underlines a problem that historians have in turning to the past when trying to answer questions about the relationship between parents and children; about
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 10:59:02 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 16:40:31 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 17:30:51 | 只看該作者
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 00:52:50 | 只看該作者
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 01:43:16 | 只看該作者
The Right to Privacy and the Right to Refuse Care for the Imperiled Newborn are more likely to be framed within the confines of major tertiary care medical centers. Thus some brief comment on the character of these institutions and the legal climate that surrounds their function is prerequisite to a discussion of the substantive issue.
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 06:16:44 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛(ài)論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-9 18:03
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
宁阳县| 威宁| 彭山县| 张家界市| 宜君县| 凤翔县| 古蔺县| 昂仁县| 遂溪县| 池州市| 稻城县| 江阴市| 紫阳县| 鹰潭市| 曲麻莱县| 鄂州市| 乌拉特后旗| 广宗县| 昭觉县| 乐东| 佳木斯市| 巴中市| 延庆县| 华安县| 留坝县| 江源县| 黄冈市| 清水县| 北川| 桃园市| 嘉兴市| 东乡县| 白玉县| 易门县| 锦屏县| 吉木萨尔县| 呼和浩特市| 库尔勒市| 开原市| 卓资县| 阜城县|